RV.Net Open Roads Forum: New Maryland state appeals court ruling on Pit Bulls

RV Blog

  |  

RV Sales

  |  

Campgrounds

  |  

RV Parks

  |  

RV Club

  |  

RV Buyers Guide

  |  

Roadside Assistance

  |  

Extended Service Plan

  |  

RV Travel Assistance

  |  

RV Credit Card

  |  

RV Loans

Open Roads Forum Already a member? Login here.   If not, Register Today!  |  Help

Newest  |  Active  |  Popular  |  RVing FAQ Forum Rules  |  Forum Help and Support  |  Contact

Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in RV Pet Stop

Open Roads Forum  >  RV Pet Stop

 > New Maryland state appeals court ruling on Pit Bulls

This Topic Is Closed  |  Print Topic  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 5  
Next
Sponsored By:
WyoTraveler

Northwest, Wyoming

Senior Member

Joined: 11/22/2011

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 05/02/12 08:28am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

The laws for owning different breeds of dogs are getting worse all the time for getting insurance. Now the Maryland appeals court handed down a ruling on Pit Bulls.

A new ruling makes it easier for anyone attacked by a pit bull or pit bull mix in Maryland to take legal action against the dog's owner.

The Maryland Court of Appeals ruling declares pit bulls as a breed are "inherently dangerous," and the owner of a pit bull or a cross-bred pit that attacks is strictly liable for damages, as is any landlord who rents to a pit bull owner.


2013 Monaco Monarch motorhome
2012 Jeep Wrangler toad
AC6CV/7 ex-W8RUR since 1954


rv2go

Fulltime (Knoxville, TN).... or someplace else

Senior Member

Joined: 12/26/2000

View Profile



Posted: 05/02/12 08:36am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

WyoTraveler wrote:



The Maryland Court of Appeals ruling declares pit bulls as a breed are "inherently dangerous," and the owner of a pit bull or a cross-bred pit that attacks is strictly liable for damages, as is any landlord who rents to a pit bull owner.

I see this as a good ruling. Too many instances of lax responsibility by owners of this breed. Other states should follow this example.


Winnebago Journey
TN Lic. RV 2 GO
Jeep Cherokee 4x4
www.rv2go.us
I'm here #4335
Travel Photos


jauguston

Bellingham, WA

Senior Member

Joined: 07/03/2005

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 05/02/12 08:44am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Good for the logical decision.

Jim


2005 Coachman Sportscoach Elite 402 40'
350hp Cat C-7 w/MP-8
7500w Onan quiet diesel generator
6-Kyocera 130w solar panels SB3024i MPPT controller
Pressure Pro TPMS
1987 Suzuki Samurai tintop Toad w/VW 1.6 turbo diesel power


ihavenoid

San Antonio Texas

Senior Member

Joined: 12/19/2007

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 05/02/12 08:48am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I'm all for it.Hope other states will follow.

WyoTraveler

Northwest, Wyoming

Senior Member

Joined: 11/22/2011

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 05/02/12 09:07am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Did you read the ruling? Mixed breed with pitt bull.

The problem I see is some person wants to get a pet from a shelter. He thinks he is getting a cute little cocker spaniel or beagle. A year later that dog gets out of the yard and accidentally bites someone. The attorney gets a court order DNA on the dog and oops, that dog just happens to some pit bull in it's lineage. If I lived in Maryland I would never get a dog unless it had pedigree papers and I knew for a fact it had zero pit bull lineage in it. Of course now your insurance company won't pay off because they have an excuse because they most likely have an exclusion on pit bulls. Just a humble opinion.

jdkd123

Northeast

Senior Member

Joined: 09/15/2004

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 05/02/12 09:17am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Wyo- I see your point but is it a FACT that DNA testing would be unequivocally positive that there is Pit Bull lineage?


JDKD123
2005 Coachmen CONCORD

GO SOX!






ScottG

Bothell Wa.

Senior Member

Joined: 02/25/2005

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 05/02/12 09:21am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I understand the above post but there will always be sticking points to anything like this. Those parties are in a very tough position and perhaps shelters need to perform some screening themselves or, offer it to potential adopters for a fee.
I still feel it's a move in the right direction.


Scott, Grace and Wesly
2003 Dodge 3500 4x4, 6 speed Cummins (lightly bombed),
2004 Forest River 25RKS many, many mods.
H0NDA eu2000i

wildtoad

Blythewood, SC

Senior Member

Joined: 06/05/2011

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 05/02/12 09:34am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Anybody with a dog that has a reputation of becoming vicious, over protective, has the potential of causeing severe harm to children, adults, or other animals should take extra precautions to make sure these events don't happen. It is also a good idea to review your liability coverage and perhaps get more. It's cheap compared to what a jury will award.


Tom Wilds
Blythewood, SC
2000 Hurricane 30Q

The Texan

Meridian, Idaho

Senior Member

Joined: 01/16/2004

View Profile



Posted: 05/02/12 09:38am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Just remember, laws and legal decisions/opinions are written by lawyers for lawyers and have absolutely nothing to do with any logic or common sense. As much as I do not care for the Pit Bull lineage, this legal opinion is the extreme that will benefit only the lawyers bottom line, nothing else.


Bob & Betsy(FishNFanatic) - USN Aviation Ret'd '78 & LEO Ret'd '03 & "Oath Keeper Forever"
'05 HR Endeavor 40PRQ, 400 Cummins-Pulling our '11 Silverado LT, Ex Cab 6.2L NHT 4x4, w/2010 Rzr or 01 V Star in back.
Where the wheels are stopped today


fordsooperdooty

Southern California

Senior Member

Joined: 08/13/2004

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 05/02/12 10:12am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Isn't that sort of like punishing the car that hit someone because it was going too fast.

Or confiscating the gun that accidently discharged and shot someone several times away from the owner.

Casting blame upon the dog itself, will lead to other breeds being demonised...according to a survey by the American Humane Association on top dogs reported as "dangerous biting breeds's" are...

10-Dalmation
9-Boxer
8-Presa Canario
7-Chow Chow
6-Doberman
5-Malmute
4-Husky
3-German Shepherd
2-Rottweiler
1-Pit Bull...which can include in most peoples minds a broad variety of dogs such as American Staff Terriers, Pit Bull Terriers, American Bull Dog, Stafforshire Terrier, etc.

Owners of cars are held accountable when their cars kill someone or maime for life someone they drove into while drunk or proven neglegent. Why are idiot, neglegent dog owners any different. Why are good people with terrific well behaved dogs singled out for punishment "just because"? Crazy.


My posts shouldn't be taken for factual data. They are purely fictional, for entertainment purposes and should not be constituted as actually related to scientific, technical, engineering, legal, spiritual or practical advice. Amen.

This Topic Is Closed  |  Print Topic  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 5  
Next

Open Roads Forum  >  RV Pet Stop

 > New Maryland state appeals court ruling on Pit Bulls
Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in RV Pet Stop


New posts No new posts
Closed, new posts Closed, no new posts
Moved, new posts Moved, no new posts

Adjust text size:

© 2013 RV.Net | Terms & Conditions | PRIVACY POLICY | YOUR PRIVACY RIGHTS