RV.Net Open Roads Forum: Truck Campers: pop up camper mpg

RV Blog

  |  

RV Sales

  |  

Campgrounds

  |  

RV Parks

  |  

RV Club

  |  

RV Buyers Guide

  |  

Roadside Assistance

  |  

Extended Service Plan

  |  

RV Travel Assistance

  |  

RV Credit Card

  |  

RV Loans

Open Roads Forum Already a member? Login here.   If not, Register Today!  |  Help

Newest  |  Active  |  Popular  |  RVing FAQ Forum Rules  |  Forum Help and Support  |  Contact

Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Truck Campers

Open Roads Forum  >  Truck Campers

 > pop up camper mpg

This Topic Is Closed  |  Print Topic  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 4  
Prev  |  Next
Sponsored By:
ecoast

NW NJ's Highlands

Senior Member

Joined: 06/01/2011

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 12/13/11 05:12pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

silversand wrote:


On a 6000 mile journey, the difference is only 41.2 gallons of fuel (at today's gas prices, under $200). So, if you drive 18,000 miles a year with your camper aboard (extremely unlikely!), and I was your chauffeur, your increased fuel consumption would be under $500.


excellent point...hard to worry about the cost when looked at like this.

I have recently had both a pop up tc, and now hardside...milage did not change appreciably,if at all, even though the HS is much heavier/less aero.

BUT- my truck is diesel.
I think with a gas rig, weight is what kills milage moreso than drag.


07 5.9 CTD & 2000 Northstar Laredo TC towing 87 Samurai ORV on dual axle trailer

SugarHillCTD

Sugar Hill, NH, USA

Senior Member

Joined: 11/29/2003

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 12/13/11 05:50pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I call B.S. to all you that get better mpgs in the mountains than on the flats.

55 mph on flat roads gets worse mileage than 55 mph in hills/mountains??

Yeah, if you are doing 35-40 mph on your big hills then 60 on the interstate, maybe.

You aren't comparing on even terms. If I did 35-40 mph on highways I could beat any mountain driving fuel mileage.

That's like saying your (dry) 11' camper weighs less than a fully loaded (wet) 8.5'. Not level comparisons.


John & Cathy
'12 Chevy 2500HD CC 4x4 sb
'12 Lance 855S
B4 that a few other TCs and a TT

ejfranz

Maple Ridge, BC, Canada

Senior Member

Joined: 03/12/2010

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 12/13/11 06:55pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

"I call B.S. to all you that get better mpgs in the mountains than on the flats."

I'll call your BS. I traveled from the west coast to the east coast and back travelling most of time at 60 mph. In the flat lands my fuel economy was worse then when I was in the mountain passes of the west coast. Less wind and when coming down the other side of a mountain I use no fuel. I do not burn twice the fuel going up a hill as I do on flat ground.

Is your Chevy a gasser or a diesel? If you have a gasser that may be the issue with your BS


06 Chevy Silverado 3500 Crewcab SRW 4WD - Allison 6 speed & Duramax LBZ.
Upgrades: BD diesel exhaust manifold, Edge Evolution, Timbrens & KYB Monomax.
Camper: 2005 Adventurer 90FWS - Electric jacks, LEDs, 6V batteries, roof rack, ladder & awning.


FreeLanceing

Grand Haven Mi

Senior Member

Joined: 11/23/2007

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 12/13/11 08:15pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

As far as the BS. I hand calc every tank when hauling my camper. I've always been pretty good at math too. The numbers don't lie 2-3 mpg better in the mountians. I ran Mi to black hills to Show Low Az to Black Hills to Mi in 3 weeks one summer.

Photomike

Southern Alberta or where the camper is parked!

Senior Member

Joined: 04/26/2008

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 12/13/11 09:50pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

SugarHillCTD wrote:

I call B.S. to all you that get better mpgs in the mountains than on the flats.

55 mph on flat roads gets worse mileage than 55 mph in hills/mountains??

Yeah, if you are doing 35-40 mph on your big hills then 60 on the interstate, maybe.

You aren't comparing on even terms. If I did 35-40 mph on highways I could beat any mountain driving fuel mileage.

That's like saying your (dry) 11' camper weighs less than a fully loaded (wet) 8.5'. Not level comparisons.


I always find it funny (or sad) that people will argue with facts. I cannot change what I have gotten, I don't know if it is because of the speed or the wind or whatever, I do know that with manual calculations that is what I have gotten.


2002 GMC 2500HD 4x4 4 Door
1992 Northern Lite 9'- 6" Camper
Homemade Cargo Trailer for hauling supplies
Advanced Elements Kayaks
Border Collie Guard Dog


NMace

Central Arkansas

Senior Member

Joined: 10/17/2010

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 12/14/11 06:12am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I think an important point that might be over looked, is most do not see much difference in mpg for a hard side and a pop-up.

It is not logical, but it was true for me.

I did notice there was less sway with the pop-up, but not much.

So it comes down to cost of the units in my mind when you pick hardside or Pop-up.

Neil


2002 Silverado 6L 1500 HD 4x4 Crew Cab
2011 Puma 295 KBHSS

SugarHillCTD

Sugar Hill, NH, USA

Senior Member

Joined: 11/29/2003

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 12/14/11 08:15am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

OK, OK.

I give up- you win.

Just not my what I have experienced.

Brings truth to the statement "your results may vary"

My Blue Heaven

Missouri

Senior Member

Joined: 03/30/2005

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 12/14/11 10:02am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I, too, get better fuel mileage in the mountains, with this rig and my previous ones.


2001 F350 Lariat CC 4WD 7.3 PSD dually, chipped, 4" SS exhaust, 350 hp, Rancho 9000's, front receiver, front & rear Roadmasters
2009 Arctic Fox 990S, storm windows, Cummins/Onan, FastGuns, Torklifts

lamadera

Northern New Mexico

Full Member

Joined: 05/16/2003

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 12/14/11 10:20am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I'm getting 15-17 MPG (diesel engine) with our pop-up, and it's on the heavy side. I do not get better mileage in the mountains, since I tend to go just as fast as the flats if possible. Driving to Canyonlands from New Mexico in october, we had a headwind and lots of up and down at mostly 7000 feet elevation, 60 - 70 MPH, I barely got 15 MPG. With no headwind and more flats it would have been closer to 17.


2004.5 Dodge 2500 CTD 4X4 Quad Cab SB, 2004 Lite-Craft Timberline

LabMan1945

North Central Maine - God's Country

Full Member

Joined: 02/23/2009

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 12/14/11 11:55am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I have a 2007 Dodge 2500 CTD and Northstar 850SC. I hand calculate ALL MPG as the computer has always been off by up to 3-4MPG. The last few years I have taken 4 extended trips that varied form 6,000 miles to just under 20000 miles on all kinds of roads and terrain, staying away from interstates as much as possible. Most trips there have been MANY stops for pictures and to just look at the scenery. I try to drive at reasonable speeds and seldom go over 60MPH. Hand calculated fuel use has been between 16.5 and 17 MPG on each trip with little variation. I normally calculate mileage at the end of the trip rather than with each tankful. General unloaded fuel economy has been around 18-19 MPG.
Grant


Dodge 2500 CTD.
Northstar 850SC
Constant companions - Scoter and Skye - Black Labs (better than most people)

This Topic Is Closed  |  Print Topic  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 4  
Prev  |  Next

Open Roads Forum  >  Truck Campers

 > pop up camper mpg
Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Truck Campers


New posts No new posts
Closed, new posts Closed, no new posts
Moved, new posts Moved, no new posts

Adjust text size:

© 2013 RV.Net | Terms & Conditions | PRIVACY POLICY | YOUR PRIVACY RIGHTS