RV.Net Open Roads Forum: Tow Vehicles: 6.0 PSD- reliability after the mods

RV Blog

  |  

RV Sales

  |  

Campgrounds

  |  

RV Parks

  |  

RV Club

  |  

RV Buyers Guide

  |  

Roadside Assistance

  |  

Extended Service Plan

  |  

RV Travel Assistance

  |  

RV Credit Card

  |  

RV Loans

Open Roads Forum Already a member? Login here.   If not, Register Today!  |  Help

Newest  |  Active  |  Popular  |  RVing FAQ Forum Rules  |  Forum Help and Support  |  Contact

Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Tow Vehicles

Open Roads Forum  >  Tow Vehicles

 > 6.0 PSD- reliability after the mods

This Topic Is Closed  |  Print Page  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 17  
Prev  |  Next
Sponsored By:
smknf250

San Diego

Full Member

Joined: 05/07/2009

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 02/19/12 11:07am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

NewsW wrote:

smknf250 wrote:

If you are going to mod your 6.0 or if you ever have the heads off, have them checked by a machine shop and magnafluxed for cracks. Maybe people that have repeat problems with puking at putting in studs, but putting warped or cracked heads back on. There is no point in doing all that work and then putting a bad head back on.



Just a minor technical note.

A lot of people who had the heads off were machining them flat and in the process, introducing to them a warp when the heads were tightened down again.

The heads do not need to be completely flat longitudinally.

By doing so, the so called flat heads after machining had a high probability of leaking.

The head flatness checking procedure for the 6.0 deviated from what machinists commonly understood and knew --- and many shops were basically introducing a major flaw / fault into the heads by their "fix".



This issue was addressed in a little known and ill understood TSB by Ford:

Quote:


TSB 06-21-10
6.0L - REVISED CYLINDER HEAD FLATNESS CHECK
PROCEDURE AND SPECIFICATION
FORD:
2003-2005 Excursion
2003-2007 F-Super Duty
2004-2006 E-350, E-450, F-650, F-750
ISSUE
Some vehicles equipped with a 6.0L engine may require the cylinder head to be removed and a
new cylinder head flatness check has been developed. This check is to ensure the component part
is not out of factory specification prior to installation. The surface quality (finish) of the cylinder
head gasket surface is machined to close tolerances which enable an effective sealing joint for
the multi-layered steel (MLS) gasket.
ACTION
Follow the Service Procedure steps to verify cylinder head flatness meets new specification.
SERVICE PROCEDURE
Preparation
^ Ensure all head gasket surfaces are clear of any gasket debris, RTV, oil, and coolant using
Motorcraft(R) Silicone Gasket Remover (ZC-30) and Motorcraft(R) Metal Surface Prep (ZC31).


NOTE

DO NOT MEASURE FLATNESS IN THE LENGTHWISE (LONGITUDINAL) DIRECTION!
THE OVERALL END-TO-END FLATNESS OF THE CYLINDER HEAD IS NOT AS
CRITICAL AS THE LOCALIZED FLATNESS CHECKS. LONGITUDINAL
MEASUREMENTS ARE NOT AN ACCURATE INDICATION OF FLATNESS WHEN
INSTALLED DUE TO THE CLAMP LOAD OF THE HEAD TO BLOCK BOLTED
ASSEMBLY. THE BOLTED CONDITION CAUSES AN OVERALL FLATNESS
CONDITION THAT DIFFERS FROM THE FREE STATE CONDITION OF THE HEAD.






If you don't want to factor in the cost of replacing the heads and redoing a botched job that involved removing the heads and machining them in error, do not buy a 6.0 that have ever had the heads off or have "improved" ARPs installed.

Chances are that the job was botched.


This is probably the reason for many 6.0s having repeated incidents of HG failures --- or cracked heads --- or other issues that is caused by warped heads.

ARPs, by applying more clamping force, can remedy this if it is not too extreme.

But that is not true in many cases.


In many cases I know, the "fix" is much worse than the "disease".


I have seen cases where engines with no evidence of Head Gasket / Heads failure were taken apart, heads improperly machined flat, then repaired with ARPs, only to spring a big HG leak that wasn't there before.

The solution was to replace the now too thin and warped (or machined flat when installed) heads with brand new ones.

Nice, huh?


They don't need to be flat (maybe I phrased that wrong) but they need to be within spec. I think it was .03 thousands....can't remember now. If you check a new 6.0 head they aren't even flat when new but are within specs. If they are out of spec they need to be replaced, not machined. The mechine shop should just magnaflux, them for cracks check valve seats and pressure test them. If they tell you they need "take some off" to get them into specs buy new ones!

RollingRockTX

Keller, Texas

Senior Member

Joined: 08/04/2006

View Profile



Posted: 02/19/12 12:40pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

To the OP

I have done the following to my truck as preventative, never had an issue but did the mods anyway.

EGR Delete
ARP's
New head gasket (B/c they were already there)
rebuilt oil cooler with updgraded kit
Coolant filter
4" turbo back no cat
Innovative Diesel tuned with XCAL II

what is next:
FCIM will be the next to get upgraded. (local guys does them in Plano for 99 bucks but may opt for the rebuilt one with higher volts. Dunno yet.

I have 98K on the clock. 20K since doing the the above. Zero problems.


Cheers


2006 Ford F250 King Ranch PSD
ARP Headstuds
ERG Delete
Diesel Site Coolant Filter System
Gearhead Performance Tuned, via XCALII, Edge Insight CTS
MBRP 4" Turbo Back, cat delete
MagHytech Rear Dif Cover
2011 Ford Expedition, HD Tow
2011 Cruiser CF33LF, KC5PFG

JPhelps

SE of Monkeys Eyebrow & Possum Trot

Senior Member

Joined: 10/01/2002

View Profile



Posted: 02/19/12 02:01pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Quote:

Let's see dodge Stopped using the 12 Valve Cummins in 1997 and ford Started using the 6.0 in 2003 do you really expect to see a bunch of 500,000 mile trucks running around in 8-9 years?

Yes. If hotshotters actually used fords, and they were reliable enough to hold up, you would see lots of them. At 100,000+ miles a year it adds up to about, well... 800,000-900,000 in 8-9 years. But you don't see them because the high mileage drivers won't use Fords because they are unreliable.
My point to begin with was that DODGE Cummins trucks were making a reliable 500 hp before the 6.oooh was ever built. A 6.oooh in not reliable when compared to the other two makers and to say that a 6.oooh is reliable at 500 hp is only something a die hard ford lover would say with any seriousness. Ford is not the only truck in town and when these claims are made in public there is a comparison to be made.

I hope these mods to the 6.0 do make them reliable, and I hope that every ones truck, GM, Ford, and Dodge, goes as far and lasts as many years as they were hoping for when they were purchased.

* This post was edited 02/19/12 02:09pm by JPhelps *

Flashman

Tucson, Aizona, USA

Senior Member

Joined: 01/02/2005

View Profile



Posted: 02/19/12 04:40pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

JPhelps wrote:

Quote:

Let's see dodge Stopped using the 12 Valve Cummins in 1997 and ford Started using the 6.0 in 2003 do you really expect to see a bunch of 500,000 mile trucks running around in 8-9 years?

Yes. My point to begin with was that DODGE Cummins trucks were making a reliable 500 hp before the 6.oooh was ever built. A 6.oooh in not reliable when compared to the other two makers and to say that a 6.oooh is reliable at 500 hp is only something a die hard ford lover would say with any seriousness. Ford is not the only truck in town and when these claims are made in public there is a comparison to be made.

I hope these mods to the 6.0 do make them reliable, and I hope that every ones truck, GM, Ford, and Dodge, goes as far and lasts as many years as they were hoping for when they were purchased.


Kinda says it all.

NewsW

US

Senior Member

Joined: 02/06/2012

View Profile



Posted: 02/19/12 04:10pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

smknf250 wrote:

If they are out of spec they need to be replaced, not machined. The mechine shop should just magnaflux, them for cracks check valve seats and pressure test them. If they tell you they need "take some off" to get them into specs buy new ones!



Confirmed!

That is what the TSB says.

How many improperly machined heads are there out there?


Tip of the hat to you for your expertise on this issue.

* This post was edited 02/19/12 04:45pm by NewsW *

NewsW

US

Senior Member

Joined: 02/06/2012

View Profile



Posted: 02/19/12 04:11pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

RollingRockTX wrote:

may opt for the rebuilt one with higher volts. Dunno yet.



The fastest way to degrade FICM performance here!

smknf250

San Diego

Full Member

Joined: 05/07/2009

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 02/19/12 05:28pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Flashman wrote:

JPhelps wrote:

Quote:

Let's see dodge Stopped using the 12 Valve Cummins in 1997 and ford Started using the 6.0 in 2003 do you really expect to see a bunch of 500,000 mile trucks running around in 8-9 years?

Yes. My point to begin with was that DODGE Cummins trucks were making a reliable 500 hp before the 6.oooh was ever built. A 6.oooh in not reliable when compared to the other two makers and to say that a 6.oooh is reliable at 500 hp is only something a die hard ford lover would say with any seriousness. Ford is not the only truck in town and when these claims are made in public there is a comparison to be made.

I hope these mods to the 6.0 do make them reliable, and I hope that every ones truck, GM, Ford, and Dodge, goes as far and lasts as many years as they were hoping for when they were purchased.


Kinda says it all.


It really doesn't say it all but I will give you some insight on some guys I have met that haul boats for a living. There is no question that the cummins is a reliable engine but it's not so overwhelming as you think it is. The reason people use cummins that drive for a living is because they can be serviced all over the US without having to go to a car dealer, parts are available all over, mobile mechanics are able to work on them, etc. There are a TON of cummins in dodge trucks that have had cracked blocks and had to have a complete short block replaced. Remember the 53 block that had tons of failures? A lot with the dowell pin that caused a major engine failure. For some reason these aren't brought up by the cummins guys. I can understand why these guys use the dodge cummins more than the others but they aren't bullet proof by any means.

NewsW

US

Senior Member

Joined: 02/06/2012

View Profile



Posted: 02/19/12 05:35pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Explain to me why this thread has been hijacked to advertise for something beside the thread topic?

Are the posters doing so paid?

Turtle n Peeps

California

Senior Member

Joined: 06/23/2008

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 02/19/12 05:54pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

NewsW wrote:

Explain to me why this thread has been hijacked to advertise for something beside the thread topic?

Are the posters doing so paid?


Because the cause and cure for the 6.0 problems are well known and have already been discussed over and over on this thread. RollingRock was the last that posted the cure. He did it right and it shows with his results.


~ Too many freaks & not enough circuses ~


"Life is not tried ~ it is merely survived ~ if you're standing
outside the fire"


NewsW

US

Senior Member

Joined: 02/06/2012

View Profile



Posted: 02/19/12 06:22pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Turtle n Peeps wrote:


Because the cause and cure for the 6.0 problems are well known



That is news to me, when posters still show up with destructive mods like "hot FICM" and tuners.

This Topic Is Closed  |  Print Page  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 17  
Prev  |  Next

Open Roads Forum  >  Tow Vehicles

 > 6.0 PSD- reliability after the mods
Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Tow Vehicles


New posts No new posts
Closed, new posts Closed, no new posts
Moved, new posts Moved, no new posts

Adjust text size:

© 2013 RV.Net | Terms & Conditions | PRIVACY POLICY | YOUR PRIVACY RIGHTS