flteng

Lethbridge Alberta

New Member

Joined: 01/04/2004

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
Offline
|
I'm hearing that the new Bell satellite launch in May 2012 means no more signal south of the most northern states. Anyone out there know anything about it? If true there will be a mass migration of Canadian Bell subscribers to Shaw Direct.
Bill & Fran
2006 Monaco Windsor
|
weasel4

Alberta

Senior Member

Joined: 07/06/2003

View Profile

Offline
|
Sounds good to me Bell deserves everything that happens to them. Much like Telus
BTC
|
gorjo01

Eastern Ontario

Senior Member

Joined: 08/23/2006

View Profile

|
Great, I dumped Bell for Shaw Direct last month. You are not allowed to use your Bell system in the USA anyways...
|
vic46

Red Deer, Alberta, Canada

Senior Member

Joined: 09/13/2007

View Profile

Offline
|
Well, I am not sure that Shaw is the answer. I have been "chatting" with them over the last couple of days. Have yet to find anyone that knew what they were talking about. Near as I can tell, Shaw supports only three antenna systems, none of which are tracking capable, as follows:
1. Motosat HD-SC2: http://www.motosat.com/index.php/tvante/69.html
2. Winegard TRAV’LER: http://www.winegard.com/travler/travler-shaw-direct.php
3. Explorer SD60a or SD75a: http://explorersc2000.com/en_products.html
Shaw just doesn't seem to care that they are again being outclassed. Telus introduced a new TV, internet and telephone service about two years ago. There were some initial snags but now all is well and they are kicking Shaw's heinie! I swithed after 12 years with Shaw direct and they called several days after I initiated the service termination. The person couldn't understand why I would change and then came up with a bunch "goodies". I simply very firmly told them that if I was not worth anythin as a customer then I would clearly be worth less as a lost customer. I think that went over the persons head at about 30K.
Vic
Historically Bell has really got their knickers in a bunch if they discovered that a canuck was accessing their sat system while out of Canada. I have no idea what the beef is or perhaps was in the event that they can somehow limit the reception south of the 49th as suggested above. Really don't understand the philosophy here.
Lack of common sense is the greatest mental illness known to mankind.
|
toban

Canada

Senior Member

Joined: 10/31/2003

View Profile

Offline
|
Come about July, we need to see if someone is in the middle to southern states travelling to confirm if in fact the signal is no more.
Toban
|
|
|
Snow River TC

BC Canada summer / Jalisco, Mexico winter

Senior Member

Joined: 04/28/2010

View Profile

Offline
|
Shaw works all the way down to Guatemala. I winter in southern Mexico and although I don't care about TV, dozens of people down there (including a lot of Americans) use Shaw.
Although I am a retired Telus employee, their satellite services further south simply do not exist. Better tracking means nothing if there is no signal to start with.
|
barberd

Cochrane, Alberta, Canada

Full Member

Joined: 01/18/2004

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
|
Vic46,
I realize that Shaw Direct does not support on the go (mobile)satellite. Neither does Telus that is for home use only, try to get Telus on the road as a Rver. For me, using SC then Shaw direct all over North America without problems has been great. Left Bell sat in 04 when they left us without sat on a 6 month trip. My Winegard traveller dish sets up when we park for the night in a few minutes every time. We do carry a portable dish for the odd time we are parked behind trees etc.
Don Barber
Don Barber
|
vic46

Red Deer, Alberta, Canada

Senior Member

Joined: 09/13/2007

View Profile

Offline
|
barberd wrote: Vic46,
I realize that Shaw Direct does not support on the go (mobile)satellite. Neither does Telus that is for home use only, try to get Telus on the road as a Rver. For me, using SC then Shaw direct all over North America without problems has been great. Left Bell sat in 04 when they left us without sat on a 6 month trip. My Winegard traveller dish sets up when we park for the night in a few minutes every time. We do carry a portable dish for the odd time we are parked behind trees etc.
Don Barber
I clearly understand the situation. I use one of my home receivers and my spare dish in the MH. My point is the head in the sand attitude of Shaw.
|
gorjo01

Eastern Ontario

Senior Member

Joined: 08/23/2006

View Profile

|
vic46 wrote: Historically Bell has really got their knickers in a bunch if they discovered that a canuck was accessing their sat system while out of Canada. I have no idea what the beef is or perhaps was in the event that they can somehow limit the reception south of the 49th as suggested above. Really don't understand the philosophy here.
My neigbour works for Bell. Apparently it is a CRTC thing which does not apply to Shaw.
|
almcc

Ontario, Canada

Senior Member

Joined: 01/15/2006

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
Offline
|
Actually, it's more of a hardware manufacturers issue than Shaw itself, since Shaw uses different technology than Bell who piggyback on the US suppliers technology. I use A tripod and get great reception in Canada, the US and Mexico.
I've even had the receiver "zapped" in Mexico when I Emailed Shaw before I learned that you can do it over the net.
|
|
|