RV.Net Open Roads Forum: New Maryland state appeals court ruling on Pit Bulls

RV Blog

  |  

RV Sales

  |  

Campgrounds

  |  

RV Parks

  |  

RV Club

  |  

RV Buyers Guide

  |  

Roadside Assistance

  |  

Extended Service Plan

  |  

RV Travel Assistance

  |  

RV Credit Card

  |  

RV Loans

Open Roads Forum Already a member? Login here.   If not, Register Today!  |  Help

Newest  |  Active  |  Popular  |  RVing FAQ Forum Rules  |  Forum Help and Support  |  Contact

Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in RV Pet Stop

Open Roads Forum  >  RV Pet Stop

 > New Maryland state appeals court ruling on Pit Bulls

This Topic Is Closed  |  Print Topic  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 5  
Prev  |  Next
Sponsored By:
rockhillmanor

On the Road

Senior Member

Joined: 12/06/2003

View Profile



Posted: 05/02/12 12:08pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

The problem with that law is it has been disputed in numerous states, and local counties "many times and thrown out" because of the lack of verbiage stated within the law as to WHO will determine if it is a pit bull and/or if the dog has pit bull in them.

If no one in that state brings this question up it will be law albeit it is impossible for anyone to determine beyond a doubt if a dog has pit bull in them, not to mention the whole issue of the 'term' pit bull itself.

IMHO people need to get more involved in their communities and stand up against courts passing nonsense laws about anything and everything they know nothing about, instead of sitting back and doing nothing. Don't care if its pit bulls or dandelions it needs to be stopped.


"We must be willing to get rid of the life we've planned,
so as to have the life that is waiting for us".


BCSnob

Middletown, MD

Senior Member

Joined: 02/23/2002

View Profile



Posted: 05/02/12 12:09pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Bad owners make bad dogs -- it's a matter of fact

Quote:

Pit bulls get a bad rap, and it's not just me saying this. I went to Frederick County's animal control division to speak with a couple of animal control officers recently. After all, they see their fair share of dogs, good and bad. One of the officers I spoke with, Mike Douglas, owns a pit bull himself. He says it's the owners, not the dogs, who are at fault when it comes to the behavior of their dogs. I spoke to four control officers, and without fail no one bad-mouthed the breed.

I am not discounting the tragedies with dogs that we hear and read about in the press -- the child who was killed by the family dog, or a renegade dog who got loose from his yard and attacked a bystander. These are sensational stories and they get our attention. But what doesn't get our attention is what's behind them.

Did we know that the owner of this dog kept him in an enclosure for 12 hours a day? Did we know that the dog was disciplined with a belt or was beaten when he did something wrong? No, we didn't hear that. We just heard about the attack.

When you only hear one side of a story, you can come up with the wrong conclusion. A poodle bit my child, so all poodles are bad. This is how it starts. This is how reputations are made.

My pit bull's name is Diesel. He's 7 years old. I met Diesel as a client. He was owned at the time by a young lady who boarded Diesel with me for about 10 days. Diesel was the sweetest dog I had ever boarded. He had personality, and he was loving. When the young lady came to pick up Diesel, I told her that if she ever had the insane thought of getting rid of him, she should please call me first.

Two weeks later, she did. She was breaking up with a boyfriend and moving back home with her father, who lived in a condo where Diesel couldn't live. I took him in, and I've never been sorry about it.

One day after Diesel came to live with me, I had a handyman working on the house. He came up the back to where my deck is -- which is where Diesel hangs out (he can see the squirrels better there). All of a sudden, Diesel saw the handyman and went crazy. I called the young lady who gave me Diesel and told her about what happened.

"Was your handyman wearing a baseball hat?" she asked.

When I told her he was, she explained that Diesel's owner before her had abused him, burned his ears with cigars and had even tried to shoot him. He also wore a baseball hat. She had intervened and took Diesel away.

There is a reason for a dog's behavior, and nine out of nine times, it's because of how they've been treated and trained.

Pit bulls are the bad dog flavor of the decade. In the 70s, it was German shepherds; in the 80s, it was Dobermans; 90s, Rottweilers; and now, it's pit bulls.

The truly sad aspect of the appellate court's decision is that because of it, hundreds, if not thousands, of homeless pit bulls will never get a loving home. They've been smeared, and needlessly so.

In the days to come, a lot of organizations that understand pit bulls will rally to try and educate the court about the breed and its behavior. There are bad people in our world and there are bad dogs, but don't label every person or dog bad because of a few.

In conclusion, with all the dogs that I've boarded over years -- including Great Danes, Rhodesian ridgebacks, pit bulls, Dobermans, etc. -- I have only been bitten four times. All by Chihuahuas.


Grub

Pierre

Senior Member

Joined: 07/13/2011

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 05/02/12 12:15pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

90% of the attacks from pittbulls happen because the owners are totally ignorant of owning a dog that NEEDS to have a solid leader to look to.


Any day enjoying the great outdoors beats any day enjoying your 8x8 office cube!

BCSnob

Middletown, MD

Senior Member

Joined: 02/23/2002

View Profile



Posted: 05/02/12 12:18pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I have no issues with holding the owner responsible for all unprovoked bites (no one free bite); but it should be applied to ALL dogs. I don't agree with the landlord liability.

I wonder if this ruling will make it easier for burglars to sue if they get bit by a pit bull inside an owners home?

Sue Bee

NW suburbs of Chicago

Senior Member

Joined: 06/05/2009

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 05/02/12 12:23pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

There are a whole load of people out there who have no idea what a pit bull is, and therefore, pitbulls get pegged for a lot of damage.

This has probably been posted before, but as an example, find the pitbull.

Statistics on dog bites still show that the #1 common factor among dogs that bite humans is that the dog is an INTACT (un-neutered) male dog. Quite often, these dogs are going after another high ranking commom denominator, unspayed female dogs in heat. Chained dogs also rank very high on the list. When you think about the kind of people who own pitbulls (or dogs that people think are pitbulls), they are likely to be chained (with heavy, heavy chains to strengthen their necks and shoulders), and intact. These dogs are also likely to be poorly socialized, and bred specifically for aggression, which is something that no responsible breeder would ever allow an aggressive dog to breed.

Many dog bite and dog attack victims are children, who unintentionally do the very things which can trigger a dog's prey drive, they are small and they make quick movements, and high pitched sounds, and they often try to flee, further triggering the dog. Dogs that are in pain, dogs that are afraid, or are senile, or provoked can attack.

Personally, I have known a few bull terriers and AmStaffs, and every one has been well behaved, social, and friendly. Some statistics from the Humane Society. Breed specific legislation is not the answer, and I don't agree that it is a good place to even start. I can't imagine having to give up a friendly, well trained dog because it is a specific breed.

Deb and Ed M

SW MI, USA

Senior Member

Joined: 06/07/2004

View Profile



Posted: 05/02/12 02:11pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

WyoTraveler wrote:

Did you read the ruling? Mixed breed with pitt bull.

The problem I see is some person wants to get a pet from a shelter. He thinks he is getting a cute little cocker spaniel or beagle.


I'm not saying ALL shelters do this - but I've sure seen a lot of dogs described as "lab mix" when they are clearly pitbull crosses. So I sort of take offense that a landlord can be dragged into the fray - having rented to the nice couple with the "lab mix"..... not everyone is able to discern breed characteristics....

Joy

Henderson KY 42420

Senior Member

Joined: 08/10/2001

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 05/02/12 02:27pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

BCSnob hit the nail on the head!!!!I have a lifetime of loving/owning dogs and 13 yrs experience working with the local Humane Society - some of the sweetest,most gentle loving dogs we've had have been what most people label Pit Bulls. To label the breed as a whole is wrong and, as the dangerous list above shows, inaccurate. It demonstrates a sad lack of education on the subject. But then when did we start to expect intelligence in public officials, etc., ?!!!


See ya' down the road!

Don-SCPO USN Ret.Corpsman
Joy-Ret.Off.Mgr.
Maggie-Chihuahua
Chrissie-Chihuahua
Lucy-Jack/Rat
'06 42' Allegro Bus DP
'06 Saturn Vue

LIFE ISN'T ABOUT HOW TO SURVIVE THE STORM BUT HOW TO DANCE IN THE RAIN.


jauguston

Bellingham, WA

Senior Member

Joined: 07/03/2005

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 05/02/12 02:32pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

In the state of Maryland from now on and probably all other states soon it will now be VERY wise to ask a potential renter with a dog that could even very slightly be one that fits the legal description to provide a legal certificate proving that dog is not one that the law applies to. That will be the only legal protection they will have. What else could the landlord do to protect himself?

Jim


2005 Coachman Sportscoach Elite 402 40'
350hp Cat C-7 w/MP-8
7500w Onan quiet diesel generator
6-Kyocera 130w solar panels SB3024i MPPT controller
Pressure Pro TPMS
1987 Suzuki Samurai tintop Toad w/VW 1.6 turbo diesel power


jack0351

Santee, CA

Full Member

Joined: 04/13/2010

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 05/02/12 05:05pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

BC Snob is exactly right. My wife is a veterinarian, and she tells me regularly she'd much rather have a pit than a chi-wa-wa. (can't spell that today). The reason that you don't hear about the little yappy dogs being biters is because they typically don't do much harm, and people think it's "Cute".

Media stereotypes are guilty as usual for condemming a breed, rather than the OWNER.


2013 Ram 3500 CCLB DRW 6.7 w/Aisin
2012 Dutchmen Voltage V3600 Toyhauler
2000 Harley FXST

tomman58

Southeast Michigan

Senior Member

Joined: 06/12/2005

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 05/02/12 07:42pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

jack0351 wrote:

BC Snob is exactly right. My wife is a veterinarian, and she tells me regularly she'd much rather have a pit than a chi-wa-wa. (can't spell that today). The reason that you don't hear about the little yappy dogs being biters is because they typically don't do much harm, and people think it's "Cute".

Media stereotypes are guilty as usual for condemming a breed, rather than the OWNER.

Yeah, I don't recall any Chawawas on the news for mameing or killing 2yr olds, pit bull more so than not.


2008 Silverado D/A,CC 4x4 ,3.73,IBC LTZ+
2012 Jayco 322 FKS
2 Trek bikes
Honda EU2000i
It must be time to go, the suns out and I've got a full tank of diesel!
Lifes short enough without bitch'n about it!


This Topic Is Closed  |  Print Topic  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 5  
Prev  |  Next

Open Roads Forum  >  RV Pet Stop

 > New Maryland state appeals court ruling on Pit Bulls
Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in RV Pet Stop


New posts No new posts
Closed, new posts Closed, no new posts
Moved, new posts Moved, no new posts

Adjust text size:

© 2013 RV.Net | Terms & Conditions | PRIVACY POLICY | YOUR PRIVACY RIGHTS