okgc

Southern Michigan

Senior Member

Joined: 09/25/2006

View Profile

Offline
|
sunlight wrote: I am considering moving from my smaller Toyota motorhome to a bigger class A. i noticed some have the 454 and some the Triton 10. Is one better? Does one have certain advantages? Does one have more of particular kind's of problems? Are both equally easy to work on? These would be about 98-2001 units. Thanks Doug
To clarify, those years were the change over years. Of course these dates are by year and approximates depending on supplies.
1998 Pxx chassis were built by GM came with 7.4 Liter (Chevy 454 engines)
1999 Pxx chassis were built by Workhorse with 7.4 Liter(Chevy 454 engines)
2000 Wxx chassis were built by Workhorse with 7.4 Liter(Chevy 454 engines)
2001 Wxx chassis were built by Workhorse with 8.1 Liter(GM engines)
The 2000 and newer Wxx chassis had the problem brakes built by Bosch.
2010 Tiffin Allegro RED 36 QSA with Chevy HHR toad
2009 Chevy 2500HD CC 4x4 w/6.0 Vortec
Sundowner horse trailer
My hobby cars
1965 Chevy Impala SS 396
1964 Chevy Nova SS
|
Patrol 65

Charleston, SC

Full Member

Joined: 01/26/2004

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
|
sunlight wrote: I am considering moving from my smaller Toyota motorhome to a bigger class A. i noticed some have the 454 and some the Triton 10. Is one better? Does one have certain advantages? Does one have more of particular kind's of problems? Are both equally easy to work on? These would be about 98-2001 units. Thanks Doug
Doug, I went from a small Toyota motorhome to a 30ft 454 motorhome and the added roominess of a class A was unbelievable. I really enjoyed the Toyota but there is no comparison to the comfort of a class A. I now own a Ford Triton V-10 which is smoothe in my opinion. Personally, I would consider floorplan more important than engine. I find that the F53 chassis is more stable because of the wider wheel track than my previous motorhomes, but then again that is comparing apples to oranges. No matter which chassis you settle on, you should be happy when you compare the comfort of your class A to your Toyota motorhome.
Nathan and Linda
KF4GYL
2000 Winnebago Chieftain 35U Ford Triton V10 F53 Banks Power Pack
|
enblethen

Moses Lake, WA

Senior Member

Joined: 01/05/2005

View Profile


|
Halibutman:
Why would you take the Ford V-10 over the 454 or 8.1 GM powertrain?
This is what OP would like to know.
Bud
USAF Retired
Suzuki XL7 pushing Pace Arrow
|
Weathertodd221

FL

Senior Member

Joined: 12/03/2009

View Profile

Offline
|
I drove both the Ford and Chevy of the mid 90s. In stock form they were the same... except the ford you needed to put your foot through the floorboard to get on a highway.
Either coach that old is going to need significant repair or maintenance. The chevy really wakes up with cold air and headers/3" single exhuast. Thats less than a grand. Coupled with the 4l80E trans... you can run 65 on the highway and get around 8mpg towing or not.
|
Gale Hawkins

Murray, KY

Senior Member

Joined: 07/22/2007

View Profile

Offline
|
The better engine is the one that is/will be in the MH parked in the driveway.
|
|
|
jassrnj

Bath, PA

Senior Member

Joined: 09/26/2011

View Profile


Offline
|
They each have their problems and strengths. Chose the MH that is in the best shape, no leaks, well maintained and has the floor plan that you like. I think you will be happy with either on of them.
|
RCtime

So. Calif.

Senior Member

Joined: 01/18/2004

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
Offline
|
The 99 Ford chassis came out with some great improvements, which in my opinion made it the better choice, not just the engine, but the whole package. However I would choose one in the 2000 or later when they increased the horsepower some.
Also, the two previous post to mine gave excellent advice.
Ron
2002 34HD Winnebago Journey DL, Cat. 330/freightliner
2004 Honda CRV - Garmin 1490t
Great wife & Cavalier King Charles Spaniel
TT/N
|
phnguyk

NJ

Senior Member

Joined: 10/02/2006

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
Offline
|
Ford chassis, trans, engine. Chevy engine, Allison trans, WH chassis.
|
sunlight

Durham,N.C.

Full Member

Joined: 10/16/2007

View Profile

Offline
|
Enblethen, and all the others. Thanks for your reviews. My assessment from all that is that both are basically good. Doug
|
Gale Hawkins

Murray, KY

Senior Member

Joined: 07/22/2007

View Profile

Offline
|
Paralysis-by-analysis is typical in rv.net threads.
|
|
|