blt2ski

Kirkland, Wa

Moderator

Joined: 03/15/2001

View Profile

Offline
|
donn0128 wrote: Turtle n Peeps wrote:
The Ally baby!!! You know the one they put in tanks! 
OH come on get real. THEY DO NOT INSTALL THE ALLISON 1000 IN TANK! I thought that fallacy was long put to bed. The Allison 1000 as I remember is only rated to handle something like 850lbFt and 26000 GCW.
ANd when the 1000 first came out, it was rated to a whopping 550 lb ft of torque! But it is an ally put in a tank! so must be good!.......yeah right  
Marty
05 Chev CC D/A LS Dooley
92 Navistar dump truck, 7.3L 7 sp, 4.33 gears with a Detroit no spin
00 Chev C2500, V5700, 4L80E, 4.10, base truck, no options!
92 Red-e-haul 12K equipment trailer
3 Single axle utility trailers
Check RV.Net Blogs at: blog.rv.net
|
Turtle n Peeps

California

Senior Member

Joined: 06/23/2008

View Profile

Offline
|
donn0128 wrote: Turtle n Peeps wrote:
The Ally baby!!! You know the one they put in tanks! 
OH come on get real. THEY DO NOT INSTALL THE ALLISON 1000 IN TANK! I thought that fallacy was long put to bed. The Allison 1000 as I remember is only rated to handle something like 850lbFt and 26000 GCW.
Really? Are you serious? Wow? And here I thought the would be a dead giveaway. Here is another to double up. 
Maybe it was the Powerglide I was thinking of they put in tanks? 
Yep, it was the Powerglide!! 
By the way. Did you know Ford owns Cummins?
~ Too many freaks & not enough circuses ~
"Life is not tried ~ it is merely survived ~ if you're standing
outside the fire"
|
JPhelps

SE of Monkeys Eyebrow & Possum Trot

Senior Member

Joined: 10/01/2002

View Profile

|
Quote: By the way. Did you know Ford owns Cummins?
Everyone knows that. They have for years. Old news......... Seriously.
|
blt2ski

Kirkland, Wa

Moderator

Joined: 03/15/2001

View Profile

Offline
|
NO NO NO....
Ford owns CUMMNGS, we all know there is no such arnimal as a cummins!..........
|
#40Fan

Colorado

Senior Member

Joined: 02/13/2011

View Profile

Offline
|
Ford doesn't own Cummins, Cummings or a real diesel.
2013 Arctic Fox 22GQ
2011 Ram 2500 CC LB CTD G56 3.42 Mineral Gray
|
|
|
Engineer9860

Eagle Scout dad

Senior Member

Joined: 08/10/2003

View Profile

|
#40Fan wrote: Ford doesn't own Cummins, Cummings or a real diesel. 
In Memoriam: Liberty Belle
|
NavyDood

NW of DFW

Senior Member

Joined: 09/25/2006

View Profile

Offline
|
Absolutely retarded IMO. The amount of money that needs to be put into an Undurablemax to make that kind of power is easily twice the price of what that 2001 truck was new. All for what... bragging rights and a feature in a magazine?
- Retired Navy Chief
- Vanilla 04 2500 QCSB, 4x4, 48RE w/MagHytec DD, Smarty Jr, 4" Exh, Modded Air Box, Isspro Gauges, Quadzilla RPG w/fuel pressure, DynaTrac front, Coolant By-Pass Filter
- 06 Pilgrim 30RE2SLF-5 13,300lbs loaded. B&W Companion
|
SoCalDesertRider

SanDiego, CA, USA

Senior Member

Joined: 12/14/2003

View Profile

|
3020 lb/ft of torque at the rear wheels is no big deal. A stock 800 lb/ft engine running in direct gear in the transmission with 4.10 axle gearing puts 3200 lb/ft torque to the rear wheels when running at an engine rpm coinciding with the max torque output of the engine.
Now 1600 horsepower at the rear wheels, that truly is something to write home about!
05E350 6.0PSD
97F350DRW 7.3PSD 4x4 4.10 11' flatbed
98Ranger
69Bronco ATC250R CR500
20' BigTex flatbed carhauler
Callen Camper
92F350 CrewCab 4x4 351/C6
B&W TurnoverBall, Curt Magnum V
HD Springs Bilsteins,
285/75-16E BFG AT on 16x8 Stocktons
4.56's & LockRite rear
|
ib516

Up here!

Senior Member

Joined: 04/18/2003

View Profile

|
SoCalDesertRider wrote: 3020 lb/ft of torque at the rear wheels is no big deal. A stock 800 lb/ft engine running in direct gear in the transmission with 4.10 axle gearing puts 3200 lb/ft torque to the rear wheels when running at an engine rpm coinciding with the max torque output of the engine.
Now 1600 horsepower at the rear wheels, that truly is something to write home about!
IIRC, the newest crop of 800 tq rated diesels put something like 650 tq to the wheels as measured on a chassis dyno. - Apples to apples.
2010 Cougar 322QBS 5er
2007 Dodge 3500 SRW Megacab, 4x4, 5.9L Cummins, 3.73, 48RE auto
HYPERTECH MAX ENERGY or DIABLO PREDATOR tuning
MBRP 4" Turbo back
Scangauge2 for Boost, Coolant temp, Rail press & Trans Temp
Torklift Stable Loads
|
Engineer9860

Eagle Scout dad

Senior Member

Joined: 08/10/2003

View Profile

|
NavyDood wrote: Absolutely retarded IMO. The amount of money that needs to be put into an Undurablemax to make that kind of power is easily twice the price of what that 2001 truck was new. All for what... bragging rights and a feature in a magazine?
At those power levels I hardly think you could call a Duramax "undurable".
As far as it being "retarded"....... Different strokes for different folks. I'm quite sure there are things about you that somebody might find to be "retarded"....... Starting with your opinion.
|
|
|