RV.Net Open Roads Forum: Toy Haulers: Here is who Supports the Sierra Club
RV Community | RV News & Reviews | RV Sales | Plan a Trip | RV Clubs & Services | RV Camping DealsRV.net
Open Roads Forum Already a member? Login here.   If not, Register Today!  |  Help

Newest  |  Active  |  Popular  |  RVing FAQ Forum Rules  |  Forum Help and Support  |  Contact

Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Toy Haulers

Open Roads Forum  >  Toy Haulers  >  Toy Haulers

 > Here is who Supports the Sierra Club

This Topic Is Closed  |  Print Topic  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 4  
Prev
DLUNA1

SFV

Senior Member

Joined: 02/06/2007

View Profile

Offline
Posted: 05/14/08 12:43pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

The best thing to do is get involved and remind our friends and fellow riders to help preserve the privileges allotted to us by respecting the land and not litter.

Richard cheese

Shafter, Ca

Senior Member

Joined: 01/10/2007

View Profile


Posted: 05/14/08 01:07pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

that is what i read all the time, but on the last few trips to Oceano, i went around with a petition to force the county of SLO to sell the land to the state.

about 2/3 were not aware of the dire situation, and probably not given a thought to it since i talked to them

sad





FarmerDill

California

New Member

Joined: 01/03/2008

View Profile

Offline
Posted: 05/14/08 03:22pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Richard cheese wrote:

funny thing...honda, the auto honda, donates on a regular basis to the Sierra Club...

idiots


It's all POLITICAL BS. They all do it, Honda, Ford etc. They pay to keep the SierraClub away.

pronstar

The LBC

Senior Member

Joined: 11/20/2007

View Profile

Offline
Posted: 05/14/08 07:16pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

FarmerDill wrote:

Richard cheese wrote:

funny thing...honda, the auto honda, donates on a regular basis to the Sierra Club...

idiots


It's all POLITICAL BS. They all do it, Honda, Ford etc. They pay to keep the SierraClub away.


Yup, it's really no different than the corporate blackmail that Jesse Jackson's foundation gets away with.


2007 Dodge Ram 2500 CTD 4x4/QC/LB
2008 Stellar 23' Toy Hauler

Richard cheese

Shafter, Ca

Senior Member

Joined: 01/10/2007

View Profile


Posted: 05/15/08 01:06pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

FarmerDill wrote:

Richard cheese wrote:

funny thing...honda, the auto honda, donates on a regular basis to the Sierra Club...

idiots


It's all POLITICAL BS. They all do it, Honda, Ford etc. They pay to keep the SierraClub away.


still doesnt make it right.....so when my favorite riding are a gets closed down, i can contribute some of it to honda

FarmerDill

California

New Member

Joined: 01/03/2008

View Profile

Offline
Posted: 05/16/08 04:50pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

That's wright Richard Cheese. Mfg's are forced to donate; I consider it modern day extortion. Otherwise, the SC would pressure them more than they already do, . . . from all angles.

willoughby

Southern California

Full Member

Joined: 08/13/2007

View Profile

Offline
Posted: 05/16/08 07:08pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I agree, they have done "some" good and their original ideas and mentality were honorable. However, just like the freaking left-wing, pot smoking, liberal ACLU, they were taken over by the far left, mentality incompetent wing nuts.

Where ever I ride, I abide by the "closed" signs, but if this keeps up, f*ck them and I'll just keep riding past them. Sometimes, a little civil disobedience is needed to get the message out.

mopeman

ID

New Member

Joined: 10/15/2007

View Profile

Offline
Posted: 05/17/08 01:22am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

BiGG wrote:

WoofersInc wrote:



The ACLU does not exist to solely protect individual rights. They pick and choose which rights and for whom they want to defend. They have never stood up for the Second Amendment. Last I checked that is still a right under the Bill of Rights. In fact they have come out publicly as being AGAINST the 2'nd.
Far as for me, ALL of the rights have equal weight. Since ACLU seems to think some are more important than others they are a joke to me and a lot of others.


I'm a guy that truly loves my guns and firmly believe in the "from my cold dead hands" thingy so I do have an iron in this fire ... that being said they do make a good point ...

Why doesn't the ACLU support an individual's unlimited right to keep and bear arms

BACKGROUND
The ACLU has often been criticized for "ignoring the Second Amendment" and refusing to fight for the individual's right to own a gun or other weapons. This issue, however, has not been ignored by the ACLU. The national board has in fact debated and discussed the civil liberties aspects of the Second Amendment many times.

We believe that the constitutional right to bear arms is primarily a collective one, intended mainly to protect the right of the states to maintain militias to assure their own freedom and security against the central government. In today's world, that idea is somewhat anachronistic and in any case would require weapons much more powerful than handguns or hunting rifles. The ACLU therefore believes that the Second Amendment does not confer an unlimited right upon individuals to own guns or other weapons nor does it prohibit reasonable regulation of gun ownership, such as licensing and registration.

IN BRIEF
The national ACLU is neutral on the issue of gun control. We believe that the Constitution contains no barriers to reasonable regulations of gun ownership. If we can license and register cars, we can license and register guns.

Most opponents of gun control concede that the Second Amendment certainly does not guarantee an individual's right to own bazookas, missiles or nuclear warheads. Yet these, like rifles, pistols and even submachine guns, are arms.

The question therefore is not whether to restrict arms ownership, but how much to restrict it. If that is a question left open by the Constitution, then it is a question for Congress to decide.

ACLU POLICY
"The ACLU agrees with the Supreme Court's long-standing interpretation of the Second Amendment "as set forth in the 1939 case, U.S. v. Miller" that the individual's right to bear arms applies only to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia. Except for lawful police and military purposes, the possession of weapons by individuals is not constitutionally protected. Therefore, there is no constitutional impediment to the regulation of firearms." — Policy #47


Wow! I can't beleive that you posted this this and like guns...did you really read what this is saying! This is the same thing that most gun grabbers are saying. First comes the registration, then comes the list of can't haves, then comes all out ban, just look at Britain and Australia. I really don't see why they are worried about myself and millions or other LAWABIDING citizens, how about taking care of the criminals!!!


'07 3500 Dodge CTD
'05 Thor Tahoe Transport 28WTB TH(made it back alive from cali!!!)

Y-Guy

Tri-Cities, WA

Moderator

Joined: 03/04/2002

View Profile

Online
Posted: 05/17/08 07:14am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Ok guys this thread has gone purely political now and when we start talking guns we know we're off topic. Let's close this one down and talk about what this forum is about, Toy Haulers, our Toys and Camping.

This Topic Is Closed  |  Print Topic  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 4  
Prev

Open Roads Forum  >  Toy Haulers  >  Toy Haulers

 > Here is who Supports the Sierra Club
Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Toy Haulers


New posts No new posts
Closed, new posts Closed, no new posts
Moved, new posts Moved, no new posts

Adjust text size:

© 2008 RV.Net | Terms & Conditions | PRIVACY POLICY | YOUR PRIVACY RIGHTS